@DonPedro
viel brauchbares hab ich nicht gefunden
trotzdem hier die Einträge:
PPP:
23:48:08 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:661] no more Echo Reply/Request packets will be reported.
23:48:08 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:48:08 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:47:08 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:47:07 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:46:07 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:46:07 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:45:07 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:45:07 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:44:07 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:44:07 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:43:07 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:43:07 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:42:07 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:42:07 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:41:07 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:41:06 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:40:06 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:40:06 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:39:06 pptp[302]: anon log[logecho:pptp_ctrl.c:659] Echo Reply received.
23:39:06 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 5 'Echo-Request'
23:38:09 pppd[292] remote IP address 62.xxx.xxx.xxx
23:38:08 pppd[292] local IP address 81.xxx.xxx.xxx
23:38:08 pppd[292] PAP authentication succeeded
23:38:06 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:880] Outgoing call established (call ID 0, peer's call ID 5124).
23:38:06 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:841] Received Outgoing Call Reply.
23:38:06 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 7 'Outgoing-Call-Request'
23:38:05 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:755] Client connection established.
23:38:05 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:721] Received Start Control Connection Reply
23:38:05 pptp[302]: anon log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:243] Sent control packet type is 1 'Start-Control-Connection-Request'
23:38:05 pptp[294]: anon log[main:pptp.c:243] The synchronous pptp option is activated
23:38:05 pppd[292] Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
23:38:05 pppd[292] Using interface ppp0
23:38:04 pppd[292] pppd 2.4.2 started by root, uid 0
04:54:12 pppd[292] Exit.
KERNEL:
auszugsweise bei der Einwahlphase:
23:38:04 kernel PPP generic driver version 2.4.2
23:38:04 kernel CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
23:38:03 kernel eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII#1 link partner capability of 45e1.
23:38:02 kernel eth1: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 41e1.
23:37:54 kernel eth1: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x7869 advertising 05e1 Link 41e1.
23:37:54 kernel eth1: VIA VT6105 Rhine-III at 0xf200, 00:00:cb:02:11:eb, IRQ 10.
23:37:54 kernel
http://www.scyld.com/network/via-rhine.html
23:37:54 kernel via-rhine.c:v1.10-LK1.1.19 July-12-2003 Written by Donald Becker
23:37:54 kernel eth0: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32 at 0xf600, 00:A0:CC:5C:7E:A4, IRQ 11.
23:37:54 kernel tulip0: MII transceiver #1 config 3000 status 7829 advertising 01e1.
23:37:54 kernel Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.15-pre12 (Aug 9, 2002)
IPCOP:
23:38:35 ipcop IPCop started.
23:38:10 ipcop PPP has gone up on ppp0
23:38:03 ipcop Dialing inode.
23:38:03 ipcop dhcpcd success
23:38:02 ipcop Starting RED device eth1.
04:54:27 ipcop Fahre IPCop herunter
04:54:10 ipcop PPP has gone down on ppp0
DHCP RED:
23:38:03 kernel: eth0 Setting full-duplex based on MII#1 link partner capability of 45e1.
23:38:02 kernel: eth1 Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 41e1.
23:37:54 kernel: eth1 MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x7869 advertising 05e1 Link 41e1.
23:37:54 kernel: eth1 VIA VT6105 Rhine-III at 0xf200, 00:00:cb:02:11:eb, IRQ 10.
23:37:54 kernel: eth0 Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32 at 0xf600, 00:A0:CC:5C:7E:A4, IRQ 11.
04:54:07 dhcpcd[234] terminating on signal 15
EINTRĂ„GE DER ROUTING TABELLE:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination........Gateway..........Genmask...........Flags....Metric....Ref..Use ....Iface
62.99.xxx.xxx.....0.0.0.0.......255.255.255.255...UH.....0......0.....0......ppp0
10.0.0.138......... 172.16.x.x...255.255.255.255..UGH.....0....0....0......eth1
172.16.x.x...........0.0.0.0.......255.255.255.0.......U......0.....0.....0.....eth1
192.168.0.0......... 0.0.0.0.......255.255.255.0......U......0......0.....0....eth0
0.0.0.0..............62.99.xxx.xxx....0.0.0.0............UG....0......0.....0....ppp0
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXENDEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
schau mal ins IPCOP FORUM ob da was ĂĽber die 1.4.0rc2 gemeldet wurde
oder im englischen Forum.
www.ipcop-forum.de
www.ipcops.net
Ich hab mal was über die Prüfsumme MD5 vom ISO gehört, vielleicht ist da der wurm drin?
hoffe du findest den Fehler!
lg